Can Tattoos Still Keep You From Getting A Job

Can Tattoos Still Keep You From Getting A Job Imagine that youre a hiring manager. Youre conducting interviews, and after reviewing the resume of your next candidate, youre feeling really excited to meet herbei. On paper, she seems to have all the necessary experience and skills.Then, your office door opens and in walks a woman with visible tattoos and pink hair.Whats your first impression? Are you suddenly less interested in hiring her? Chances are, your age influences the way you answer these questions. Indeed, our latest research found that younger hiring professionals are mora open to hiring women with less conventional appearances.In our survey, we showed hiring managers images of 15 different professional women. These womens appearances varied in their attire, hairstyle, age, body size, and race. We then asked participants to share their assessments of the candidates. In general, we found that younger respondents were much mora accepting of the woman with visible tattoos than their older peers. This is, of course, great news for professional women who dont have a necessarily cookie-cutter look, and points to the hope that old biases may be becoming less relevant as millennials and those after them take over leadership positions.And it isnt just workplace biases against tattoos that, thanks to millennials, may be lifting. Heres a look at what our data revealedOlder women(Photo leistungspunkt AdobeStock/Andrey Popov)If youre over a certain age and have ever tried a career change, you know its difficult, as people tend to feel more enthusiastic toward young talent. Hiring managers who are older themselves, though, more than likely dont buy into this same bias toward mature job seekers. Right? Interestingly, our study found that this isnt always the case.The survey included an image of an older woman with gray hair (above). Surprisingly, hiring professionals between ages 25 and 34 were actually much more likely to hire her (30 percent) than respondents over 54 (15.3 percent). Younger hiring managers were also more likely to describe the older woman as professional and leadership material two of the top qualities hiring managers said were the most important when evaluating candidates. That data broke down as followsHiring professionals between 25-34 who said the older candidate wasProfessional 63.4%Leadership Material 41%Hiring professionals over 54 who said the older candidate wasProfessional 61.5%Leadership Material 23%Plus-sized women(Photo credit AdobeStock/Marcin Sadlowski)Many plus-sized women (and women in general, really) worry people will automatically judge them by their size. Unfortunately, in the hiring process, they often do.In our survey, the heavier-set candidate (pictured above) was more likely to be labeled lazy. Older respondents were the harshest assessors of those aged 54 or older, 23 percent described her as lazy and only 7.7 percent said she was leadership material. In comparison, 21.7 percent of 25-34 year olds said she was lazy and 18.9 percent described her as a leader.Younger hiring professionals were also more likely to hire the plus-sized woman. Only 7.7 percent of the oldest respondents would hire her, but 17.2 percent of the youngest would.Tattooed women(Photo credit AdobeStock/Rawpixel.com)Traditionally, people see women with tattoos as being unprofessional. But that is slowly changing. Hiring managers are learning that someone can have visible tattoos and still be a committed, respectable employee.For instance, 53.8 percent of respondents who were 54 or older described our tattooed candidate as unprofessional. For that demographic, she ranked No. 1 for being unprofessional. However, only 37.5 percent of 25-34 year olds said she was unprofessional.Visible tattoos also affected this candidates hireability with the older hiring managers subset. Only 7.7 percent of these respondents would consider giving her the job, while almost a third of the youngest hiring managers would.What this means for womenAre women still facing biases during the hiring process that are based on their appearances? Yes. Its unfortunate, but since younger hiring professionals are more accepting of a larger variety of womens appearances, positive changes are coming. As these professionals continue to age and hold more hiring positions, the workplace will hopefully become more inclusive and value people for their actual merits, not their looks.As for now, there are still things women can do to work around existing hiring biases. For example, older women shouldnt hesitate to apply at up-and-coming startups. Hiring professionals at these companies may actually be more likely to hire you than those at an established corporation. And once older hiring managers begin to see that theyre receiving fewer applicants, perhaps theyll become more open-minded or otherwise risk missing out on great talent.